 |
|
      |
 |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
06-03-2009, 12:08 AM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 858
|
California SB250 passed today
I am not sure how this will affect any California Breeders, but I just read that SB250 the mandatory spay/neuter bill passed the state senate today
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bil...ed_sen_v96.pdf
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
06-04-2009, 05:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pueblo West, CO
Posts: 105
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
I guess I am not understanding it right but doesn't this only applies to private owners? It doesn't mention anything about breeders.
__________________
www.coloradomountainlabradoodles.com |
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,005
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
From my understanding (one quick read through) it will require any person owning a dog to procure a licence to keep the dog intact, for each dog. Cash grab
 . And it does not specify the requirements for getting the licence. Can any dog get one? or are they going to limit it to recognized breeds? And if the dog is picked up as a stray, if it escapes your yard just one time, they may sterilize it and charge the owner for doing it. Can imagine if that happened to your best breeding girl right before she was due for heat, with the litter presold? And the word "sterilize", instead of desex, or spay/neuter is wrong. Sterilize is to make clean, like an intact dog is dirty. Can i give them proof of sterilization as a reciept of a bath at a groomers 
|
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 09:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 858
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
That's how I understand it too Todd, the licensing fees are as yet 'undisclosed' and will be issued by local authorities- so I can see some cities charging a ton for these licenses since they are hurting for revenue so badly
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-04-2009, 11:07 PM
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,744
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
It was passed in the senate....doen't it take some additional voting to become law?
I thought I read somewhere that this is so bad that the SPCA is against it.... 
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2009, 06:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: northern California
Posts: 9,243
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
This passed one house. It needs to pass both houses and be presented to the Governor for signature before it becomes law...let's hope that somewhere along that line there is reason. *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2009, 06:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: northern California
Posts: 9,243
|
Re: California SB250 passed today
Quote:
It affects every dog owner...breeders or private. The intent of a law like this is to stop all breeding of domestic pets. PETA is behind it and they basically believe that animals are better off dead than "in captivity". |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
